Secure Remote Access Battle Card
| Key Competitive | Excalibur (Modern) | Segura (Traditional) |
|---|---|---|
| 🎯 Approach | ✅ Unified Platform, Passwordless-first, visual streaming isolation | ⚠️ Traditional PAM with credential vaulting |
| 🔐 MFA Integration | ✅ Built-in, Passwordless | ⚠️ External MFA providers |
| 🔐 Web Access & RBI | ✅ Native DOM-streaming RBI with WAF, bi-directional protection | ❌ No RBI-WAF capability |
| 🔐 Endpoint Agents | ✅ Fully agentless, HTML5 browser only | ⚠️ Agent-based for full functionality |
| ⚡ Complexity | ✅ Low: Cloud-native, deploys in hours | ⚠️ Traditional deployment model |
| 🏛️ NIS2 Readiness | ✅ Full coverage out of the box, single platform | ⚠️ Partial — needs additional modules |
| 🏛️ Data Sovereignty | ✅ 100% EU owned & operated, zero US footprint | ⚠️ Verify company jurisdiction and US footprint |
| 💰 Total Cost (TCO) | ✅ Lower, streamlined licensing | ⚠️ Varies — evaluate total cost with add-ons |
Headquartered in the EU. All development, data processing, and operations within EU jurisdiction. No foreign parent company, no US subsidiary, no US employees.
Complete digital sovereignty — no foreign government can access your dataZero US presence means zero legal obligation to comply with US CLOUD Act demands. No forced data disclosure, no secret backdoors, no gag orders.
Your data stays under EU law — periodSingle platform covers access control, MFA, privileged session management, monitoring, and incident response requirements mandated by NIS2 Article 21.
One vendor, one platform, one contract — compliance achievedVerify Segura's company ownership, data processing locations, and any US employees, offices, or subsidiaries that could create CLOUD Act exposure.
Content will be expanded — detailed analysis pendingEvaluate NIS2 coverage completeness. May require additional vendors for MFA, session monitoring, or incident response.
Content will be expanded — detailed analysis pendingTypical PAM solutions rely on external MFA providers. No native passwordless capability — additional vendor dependencies likely.
Content will be expanded — detailed analysis pending| Sovereignty Dimension | Excalibur SAM | Segura | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Ownership | ✅ 100% EU owned, zero US footprint | ⚠️ Verify jurisdiction | Sovereignty |
| US CLOUD Act | ✅ Not subject — zero US presence | ⚠️ Verify US footprint | Data protection |
| Built-in MFA | ✅ Passwordless, integrated | ❌ Likely external MFA | Simplicity |
| Zero-Trust Isolation | ✅ True air-gap via DOM streaming | ❌ Traditional approach, no RBI | Security posture |
| Deployment Speed | ✅ Hours — cloud-native, agentless | ⚠️ Traditional deployment timeline | Time to comply |
| Architecture | ✅ Cloud-native Kubernetes | ⚠️ Evaluate architecture model | Future-proof |
Excalibur's air gap architecture creates complete isolation between endpoints and resources — eliminating attack paths that traditional PAM cannot close.
Bi-directional RBI-WAF protects both users and web applications — a capability traditional PAM solutions do not address.
Built-in passwordless MFA eliminates credential vulnerabilities and simplifies deployment compared to external MFA dependencies.
Kubernetes-based deployment provides superior scalability and reduced operational overhead compared to traditional deployment models.
Zero US footprint provides categorically stronger sovereignty guarantees. As EU regulations tighten, having zero foreign jurisdictional exposure is a decisive advantage.
Compliance drives purchasing. Excalibur covers all NIS2/DORA requirements in one platform that deploys in hours. When coverage is comparable, price, speed, and sovereignty decide.